A mutilated adaptation that not only excludes some of the most interesting themes of the original book but betrays them. The bucolic magic landscape is constructed through CGI, which erases some of its potential as a metaphor for maturity and growth. The artificial images offer expressiveness of the psychology of the characters, but also destroys the essence of a book that speaks of nature as a vitalizing effect.

The use of the lightning at least was good, the rest was all horrible, horrible acting, horrible adaptation, one of the worst movies I´ve watched this year. [spoiler] The dog was real or made with CGI?[/spoiler]

Did we really need another adaptation of The Secret Garden? No, not really, and this film confirms that. It's not that the film is bad (although it is pretty average), it's just that it offers nothing new to audiences already familiar with the book and the other film adaptations.

**Agnieszka Holland**'s adaptation of **The Secret Garden (1993)** is one of the best movies adapted from a children's book. Featuring who's who of cinema -- atmospheric cinematography by **Roger Deakins**, haunting score by **Zbigniew Preisner**, and screenplay by frequent **Tim Burton** collaborator, **Caroline Thompson** -- 1993 adaptation is a great film that does not shy away from dark source material. As its core, it is ultimately about opening yourself up by embracing others. On paper, this 2020 adaptation released during COVID-19 pandemics is nearly as impressive. Utilizing modern CGI technics, the film is a sight to behold. The garden never looked more beautiful. The music by typically great **Dario Marianelli** is subtle but fits the quiet narrative. The cast of young unknowns is competent enough, but the problem is lack of focus. The central theme seems to be the magical connection between the garden and your past. By confronting your past, the garden magically heals. If this psychology theme seems hokey, it is. Also problematic is the film's interpretation of Mary Lennon, played by newcomer **Dixie Egerickx**. The character does not make any much efforts to connect with others. Just about the only element that works is Archibald Craven (played by **Colin Firth**), who provides the film's lone heartfelt moments.

So Colin Firth's character had no relation in blood to the girl, right? They kept calling him uncle. I thought he is her mother's brother.