T_rr_bl_! My adv_c_ ? Sk_p _t!

This move is soooo bad and such a waste of time. Bad plot, bad writing and everyone over-acting... it's not even good enough to be a bad 'B' movie. Al Pachino used to be a good actor, but about 20 years ago he just gave up and keeps phoning in his work. If you've seen any of his films you'll see it right away... same expressions, same attitude, same "acting" for 20 years now. This movie is a dog - don't watch!!

Why the hell they did not chase him in the church and in the slaughterhouse? It could be very good movie, but some things were pretty illogical.

Al Pacino shouldn't be playing any kind of role that involves him having to use a southern accent... Other than that the movie was tolerable. Plot was decent but predictable.

_Hangman_ had the potential to be a standout thriller with Al Pacino's involvement, but it fell short of my expectations. While it wasn't a terrible movie, it left me feeling underwhelmed. The film's writing and pacing issues prevented it from becoming the gripping thriller it could have been. As a fan of Pacino, I can't help but wish that this film had been more compelling.