جاري التحميل...
جاري التحميل...



Avis de la communauté (6)
Roger Corman’s famously low-budget superhero picture that, some say, was never really meant to see the light of day. The director, stars and creatives all insist their efforts were genuine, but Marvel considered it a brand-tarnishing disaster, rushed out the door to renew a timed licensing agreement. They bought and destroyed the negatives, canceled promotional engagements and denied its existence for years. Fortunately, a bootleg VHS copy eventually leaked to the comic convention scene and this miraculous golden turd is now readily available for anyone who knows where to look. And man, is its reputation well-earned. _Fantastic Four_ is an astoundingly incompetent adaptation, jammed with laughable special effects, listless performances, cruddy camerawork, groan-worthy dialogue and dated hero/villain dynamics (even by 1994 standards). Its sets are cheap and dreary, trapping the colorful heroes in a series of clinical corridors and dim cellars. Their use of super powers is extremely limited, no doubt owing to a tight budget that mostly went to a half-animatronic rubber suit for the Thing. Who, for the record, looks like a reject from the live-action _Ninja Turtles_ movies, his robotic lips sneering in a creepy, out-of-sync, private dance. Sometimes they almost match his dialogue. Thing and Doom are both dying for overdubs, their actors’ voices muffled by so many layers of fake metal and prosthetics. In fact, there’s a lot of ambient sound in general. Doom’s clickety-clack fingers are a prime offender there, accented by Joseph Culp’s penchant for hilarious physical over-acting to compensate for his lack of expression behind the mask. Culp’s technique is like a blend of jazz hands, interpretive dance and American Sign Language; a constant, reliable trigger for unintentional laughs. In a light ninety minutes, we rush through Doom and the Fantastics’ well-tread origin stories, meet a few uninspired supporting characters (including “The Jeweler,” a movie-only concoction who’s little more than a Dollar Store _Batman Returns_ Penguin), escape captivity and point shiny green death lasers at New York City. None of it really matters. You’re either here to bask in the flames of big-time comics’ Hindenburg moment or you’re watching the wrong movie. _Fantastic Four_’s only rewards are of the perverse variety, but ironic audiences will find plenty of those to enjoy. A GREAT ambush selection for movie night with friends, with a parting shot none will soon forget.
In 1994, special effects were very different. This movie was done on a budget - and produced by Roger Corman - both a very bad sign. And so even for an entusiast, this is pretty hard going, and comes across mostly as a comedy (although it wasn't intended as such). And, I hate to add, it reminds even a fanboi like me that once upon a time, in a country far far away, Stan Lee was involved in some awful movies.
The 1994 *Fantastic Four*, an unreleased Roger Corman production, is a scrappy, earnest attempt at Marvel’s first family. With a $1 million budget, the visuals—practical effects and basic CGI—are dated but functional for the era, capturing comic-book vibrancy. The cast, led by Alex Hyde-White and Rebecca Staab, delivers sincere performances, nailing the team’s dynamic despite clunky dialogue. The plot, though muddled by a pointless Jeweler subplot, stays true to the source. Its low-budget charm and campy heart make it a cult curiosity, outshining later, bigger-budget flops in fidelity, if not polish. A flawed but lovable relic.
We have had such weak adaptations that this comes off as the most faithful. Costume wise and some sets straight from the comics. Though yeah it still isn’t good. The movie is too goofy. if Batman & Robin got released in theaters. This might as well have been too though. It was at least made with love.
For a film done in the ‘90s you kind of know what to expect. But what you don’t expect is how cheesy and totally varied the tone of the film is. Is it comedy? At times. Is it serious and slow paced? At times. Is it a top quality origins story for a well know super hero character? At times. Does the kid grow up by 30 years in the space of 10? Well… yeah. At least they got the “Clobberin’ Time” line in.