A lot of confirmation bias on both sides and a lot of info left out, but the central thesis is convincing The show follows the efforts of former LA District Attorney's Office prosecutor Loni Coombs, investigative journalist Billy Jensen, and forensic criminologist and former cold case investigator Paul Holes as they try to uncover enough evidence to convince the San Diego Sheriff's Department to declare Zahau's death "undetermined" and re-open the case. It's fairly compelling stuff, but as a TV show, although some fascinating questions are raised regarding the nature of the 'suicide', much of the four hours feel unnecessarily padded. This is especially frustrating when one considers just how much information is left out; information one can learn by watching the superior (and much shorter) Rebecca Zahau: An ID Murder Mystery (2019), or by listening to Dr. Phil McGraw's excellent five-episode podcast on the case, "Mansion of Secrets: The Mysterious Death of Rebecca Zahau" (2019), part of his Mystery and Murder: Analysis by Dr. Phil series. Completely confident in their assertion that Zahau was murdered and their belief that they know both who did it and why, the trio at the centre of Death at the Mansion spend a lot of time talking about the confirmation bias of the police, apparently unaware that their own bias is clear to see. This isn't a bad introduction to the case, but I'd strongly advise that, if you're interested in Zahau, you supplement your viewing with something a little more objective. For my complete review, please visit: https://www.themoviedb.org/review/5ed7029b0398ab0023d04a93