Ist half is ok...I don't know what happened at the second half P.s history of violence is simple and pure Leo was a bad remake

This time around, it was not Lokesh Kanakaraj, or Anirudh but it was actually the "actor" Vijay who managed to single-handedly carry this somewhat of a weaker script especially in the 2nd half, with his best performance in recent times as a star & an actor. Leo definitely is a Lokesh Kanakaraj film, but it didn't feel as organised or well written as his previous one's, although the action sequences worked very well, while every other side characters, including the villains were heavily sidetracked & the 2nd half fell flat due to not being able to get that proper connect it was supposed to have, Lokesh decided to unleash Vijay as PARTHIBAN, but not LEO DAS, yes, PARTHIBAN was the MVP for me, not LEO 😉 and that definitely worked out for the better for me personally I'd say.

Vijay walking into the LCU is everything it promised to be on paper. The problem is what surrounds that promise. The first half is genuinely gripping - the quiet menace, the cafe life unraveling, the slow reveal. But the second half goes full mass and loses the character depth that made the setup so interesting. Based on A History of Violence and doesn't hide it - but that film worked because it stayed intimate. Leo gets too big too fast. That's the good part and the bad part altogether.

It's a great theatre experience movie. I love watched in theatres

❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ - It was filled with suspense, happiness, anger and emotion. Con - some of the Action scenes were horrible I thought at one point I was watching a Telugu film. I had high hopes not because of Vijay and Logesh but goes of how much the media was talking about. I was not happy to see Vijay kissing back Trisha twice. Trisha gets out of Vijay and his family. My rating system works: 10❤- Masterpiece 💯 9❤- Excellent 8❤ - Amazing 👌 7❤- Great 🌞 6❤ - Good 👍 5❤ - Average 🤕 4❤ - Bad but watchable :octagonal_sign: 3❤ - Bad 😭 2❤- Awful :face_vomiting: 1❤ - Bull Shit