Reviews made me pass on this film, finally watched it and it was decent. Great end to this weird ass trilogy. Loved the post-credits scene too, hilarious and a nice nod to previous films. Like seriously, this film is much better than everyone else is making it out to be.

OMG! This was so bad. No words. Laughter: 0 Waste of time and money.

I’m not entirely sure why this movie is getting so much hate. I do agree that this installment not as good as the first two parts of the trilogy, as some scenes of the movie seem rather contrived (for example the way Zach’s character development is portrayed). Nevertheless, I did enjoy the movie as a whole, especially because of its twists and the humor that spiced up the story. The acting was spot-on as well, especially Ken Jeong as Mr. Chow. In conclusion, a solid movie, despite the harsh criticism it's getting.

"Chow!" Didn't like it at the cinema, didn't like it again at home. Too much Chow, the jokes don't land that much, again Las Vegas, the scene with Chow eating dog food, not funny at all and it felt to me like all the boys were phoning it in. However John Goodman was the bright light. If you want to watch one of these films, watch the first one. It's legit funny.

So is this better than the second installment? Yes it is. Is it better than the original? Nowhere near. But you'll still have a great time if you're a fan of the franchise in general. The film's main set piece at Caesars Palace is worth the ticket price alone.