This movie was not as bad as people are making it out to be. I really loved how the ship logs from the book got all the attention for this movie. It kept me entertained throughout the whole movie. What else is there to ask of a movie than to be entertained? It may not be a must watch but it definitely is not a waste of time. That's for sure.

Man people are tearing this movie apart. To be honest, it wasn’t the best, but it wasn’t all that bad either. I definitely walked away not wishing I could have my time back. It was a really good concept on the story of how Dracula got from Romania to England, but it would of been nice to see more of the story before he was already in the process of being shipped. Some of the character build up a dialogue could of been better, but over all it enjoyed it for what it was.

It's a bad movie and it's boring as heck. It started off ok but then quickly turned to poop. An hour and a half into it I was wishing it would end. They torture us with terrible dialogue and some pathetic attemps at being profound. The burning special effects are unacceptably bad. To seal the crapiness deal they end with a cliff hanger that would suggest they are hoping to make a part 2 - fat chance!

I was questioning who directed this move (The Autopsy of Jane Doe, Troll Hunter) and who wrote it (Bullet Train). Are these the same people? Because I enjoyed their previous work, but I am left baffled by this uninspired, painfully average flick. Demeter's fateful journey to England is one of my favorite parts of Dracula: the limited set, the foreboding storm, the crew that is picked off one by one by an invisible force. This movie has no idea what makes horror effective beyond cheap jump scares. What makes Dracula so much more effective, is that the monster is not a generic creature, but a supernatural man of ancient power, mystery, intelligence, and menace. All of that is lacking in the movie. The characters are also not very compelling, and have very limited backstory of no impact. I feel like everyone involved was assigned homework they didn't feel like doing, so they slapped together his mediocre piece. Too bad because I had high hopes, considering my love for the original material. Also, [spoiler] the dog dies, and I don't like it [/spoiler].

Like a one-floor house in a suburb: flat and no story. What starts off as a really good idea (what happened to the crew on the boat that brought Dracula to England) makes some good decisions but eventually founders with uneven pacing and is scuttled by its shallow storytelling. (There is also a slight anachronism in that the film claims to be based on Stoker's Dracula [which does discuss the Demeter's voyage], but in Stoker's version vampires can exist in daylight unscathed, while in this film they cannot.)