Wow, where to start? I know it's difficult to watch something almost a half century after it came out and appreciate it for what it was. That said, the appreciation for this film baffles me. First and foremost, I thought that it was rather corny. Over this years this film had become symbolic of a film that was rebellious and shocking and I can say that I found it to be neither (A Clockwork Orange it is not). It also has a reputation as being erotic but I think that might be the result of the era in which it was released. We've all seen movies about two damaged people that were damaged and crossed paths for a brief time. In recent years Leaving Las Vegas was probably the best example of this. Hell, I don't even know if the female character was damaged. I think she was just bored and had a bit of a daddy complex. That brings me to my first major complaint about the movie - the story of her and her boyfriend (almost half of the movie) was completely awful. Really, what was that about? At its core the anonymous encounters between the two leads was interesting for a while. The resolution to their relationship was not unexpected and in a way it almost seemed anticlimactic. I think that the best thing that can be said about this film is that in a way Paul may have been playing Brando. follow me at https://IHATEBadMovies.com or facebook IHATEBadMovies

The original title of the film is Ultimo tango a Parigi.

Bernardo Bertolucci’s Last Tango in Paris was probably considered a masterpiece in its time. I watched it because it’s often listed among the “classics” one ought to have seen. Honestly, I found it dull and largely uninteresting. It tells the story of two strangers who have sex without really knowing anything about each other. Beyond the curiosity of seeing what Paris looked like in the 1970s, the film offers little of real value apart from the actors’ performances, which are admittedly well executed.

A very scandalous film at the time.

The clue is in the jazz.