جاري التحميل...
جاري التحميل...



يقرر أب شراء آلة لمساعدته في شؤون المنزل والعائلة، ولكن سريعًا تكتسب الآلة الوعي وتصبح أداة للقتل؛ فتصبح حياة العائلة برمتها في خطر.
Avis de la communauté (11)
If you ever watched any "sentient AI" movies before, you'll know how Subservience will end. It was honestly fine up until the halfway mark and then it became absurdly predictable from there. Not good or bad, just a harmless mediocre movie that doesn’t overstay its welcome.
“Subservience” feels like it was born from a lazy “what if” brainstorming session. “What if we made a sexy thriller? What if we threw in some futuristic robots? What if Megan Fox was an android villain?” The premise has potential, sure, but the final product isn’t just disappointing—it’s a full-blown mess, packed with absurd twists and creative choices that make it impossible to take seriously. The opening teases something interesting: a father (Michele Morrone) looks for a robot to help with housework while his wife Maggie (Madeline Zima) is hospitalized. Megan Fox enters as the “ideal” android with an undeniably striking presence, but things quickly go downhill. The film immediately tosses logic out the window by revealing the wife isn’t dead—she’s just in the hospital. This kind of basic storytelling misstep, which should be laying the groundwork for a consistent tone, sets the stage for the lack of clear direction from director S.K. Dale. Fox, who could have turned this into a standout performance as a cold, calculating android, unfortunately, swings between apathetic and unintentionally laughable. Granted, a lot of that blame lies with the script, which places her in scenarios that feel ripped from a poorly written teenage fantasy. Instead of subtly manipulating the husband, the film leans on gratuitous sex scenes that add nothing but secondhand embarrassment. Worse yet, there’s the husband’s excuse when his infidelity is discovered: “I was horny, and you were in the hospital for a week.” It’s the kind of dialogue that makes you want to turn the movie off immediately. The movie’s attempt at psychological thrills quickly derails in a third act that wants to be “M3gan” but fails spectacularly. The shift into over-the-top action doesn’t just ruin the pacing—it highlights how the film doesn’t know what it wants to be. There’s no cohesion between the genres, and any underlying message—like commentary on robots replacing human jobs—is drowned out by bad dialogue and ineffective action sequences. Speaking of subtext, the film half-heartedly brushes on relevant topics like social inequality and the impact of technology on the workforce. But these ideas are so shallowly addressed that they feel more like distractions than genuine attempts to add depth. Instead, the audience gets a parade of clichés paired with direction that can’t decide if it wants to be sultry, scary, or funny. Michele Morrone and Madeline Zima deserve some credit for trying—desperately—to inject a shred of dignity into this script. Zima, in particular, seems like she’s acting in a completely different movie, bringing emotion and humanity to scenes that barely demand it. As for Fox, who’s proven her potential in roles like “Jennifer’s Body,” she’s undercut by direction that seems more interested in showcasing her looks than her talent. Overall, “Subservience” is a disaster that doesn’t even achieve the dubious honor of being “so bad it’s good.” It’s a frustrating experience that squanders a promising premise, a capable cast, and even Megan Fox, who could have been a memorable villain. Instead, the film stumbles over its own ambitions, delivering something that’s neither nostalgic, modern, nor entertaining. It’s just... bad.
it was fun enough for the "ai has free will oh no" genre, nothing groundbreaking but well-acted and pretty to look at. i go into all horror movies with zero expectations, though, as a disclaimer. if you want other android things to watch, a couple of my favorite movies are ex-machina (god it's just perfect) and lifelike (an incredible twist). suspension of disbelief issues below: [spoiler] * we've already made some crazy advances in the real world when it comes to robotics in medicine, so why would we do organ transplants using humanoid robots instead of improving upon the high accuracy and precision of existing robotic technology?? like, an eye surgeon used a robot to give me near-perfect vision in under an hour in 2015. i get that it was probably fun to demonstrate one of the ways that androids might be constructed when they don't serve a function that involves talking to humans, but don't tell me we need artificial clunky human-sized hands inside a chest cavity when we could have invented ways to transplant entire organs laparoscopically or something * we've also already started developing organoids and organ tissue for research testing. you're telling me they still have to wait for an actual human heart donation instead of being able to synthetically create bio-identical organs in this timeline?? you could still create the same tension and familial strife without her needing to wait for a human donor: finances (because the dad bought an expensive ass android???), technological limits, WHATEVER * SHE DIDNT SENSE THEM HIDING BEHIND THE DESK LITERALLY RIGHT NEXT TO HER WHAT HAPPENED TO HER REFLEXES??? OR SENSING BLOOD PRESSURE?? HEART RATES?? just be CONSISTENT * as a tired millennial who uses subtitles on everything i wish they would've done "(maggie's voice)" instead of "(in maggie's voice)" to aid in suspension of disbelief during scenes where alice uses maggie's voice off-camera [/spoiler]
I liked it. The script is predictable. I like this woman's acting. She did a great job. The effects are also nice. The artificial intelligence issue is handled well. It's not one of my favorites, but it's very successful. If you like this kind of movies, definitely watch it. I think there may be a second movie. Something happened in the last scene. Thank you for your efforts.
I hope AI doesn't see this when it becomes conscious because this could single-handedly destroy humankind as we know it. The main purpose of this was to show the 'services' AI can offer, in the form of Megan Fox. The title tells you that before anything, my issue is with humans. The robots are more human-like than the actual humans. Hollywood is plagued with 'don't trust AI' and you guessed it, they all trust AI. If you want story and quality, watch 'Ex-Machina', it's much more realistic and makes sense. If you want '365 days' with on-the-spot plots, while being aesthetically pleasing, then this is for you. 'o JeSUs I WaS aRtTBroKen'.