


Initialement, la série documentaire américaine "The Vietnam War" retrace les trente années de soulèvements et de destructions de la guerre du Vietnam, qui firent plus de trois millions de morts, à travers les récits intimes de près d’une centaine de témoins. Elle est constituée de 10 épisodes d'une durée de 88 à 118 minutes. En 2019, Arte en produit une version sous le titre "Vietnam", constituée de 9 épisodes de 51 à 58 minutes. Ils conservent la même structure chronologique à l'exception de l'épisode 4 qui traite de la période de janvier 1966 à décembre 1967, couverte par les 4e et 5e épisodes initiaux.
Avis de la communauté (6)
Going into this documentary I had very little knowledge about Vietnam. I knew it went poorly for the US, but I didn't even know the outcome. The series started with a historical summary of the colonial period. Then the war begins. With every episode, the reality gets sadder. My disbelief kept growing. The US leadership making one mistake after the other, while South Vietnam was being consumed by greedy and corrupt politicians. The common people kept dying and the leadership kept pumping more of them into the meatgrinder. I was waiting with every episode for things to finally change for the better, but it kept getting worse and worse. To call this war a tragedy is an understatement.
The Vietnam War, directed by Ken Burns and Lynn Novick, is an extraordinary documentary series that offers one of the most comprehensive, balanced, and emotionally resonant looks at one of the most complex conflicts of the 20th century. It’s not just a documentary about a war—it’s a documentary about the people, decisions, consequences, and trauma surrounding it, on every side of the battlefield. What I particularly appreciate is how the series doesn’t begin with American boots on the ground. Instead, it starts much earlier—back in the era of French colonial rule—laying a foundation for Vietnam’s long and painful struggle for self-determination. That choice gives a crucial sense of context that many other portrayals of the war skip entirely. It reframes the Vietnam conflict not just as an American tragedy, but as a continuation of decades of resistance, foreign domination, and civil upheaval within Vietnam itself. The series spans ten episodes and nearly 18 hours, but it never drags. It’s methodical without being slow, detailed without becoming overwhelming. The use of first-hand interviews with both American veterans and Vietnamese soldiers and civilians—on both sides of the conflict—adds a profound human layer to the narrative. These voices make the history feel lived-in and immediate, and they often contradict or complicate each other in ways that challenge easy answers or tidy historical narratives. The archival footage is powerful, the narration by Peter Coyote is calm and authoritative, and the musical choices—from era-appropriate rock to a haunting original score—are deeply effective in setting the mood and grounding the viewer in each time period. This is one of the most thoughtful and complete documentaries I’ve ever seen on the subject. It doesn’t glorify or condemn—it tries to understand, and in doing so, invites the viewer to do the same. A monumental work. 9/10.
This mammoth, 17+ hour documentary about The United States’ war in Vietnam is not perfect; it is a flawed film in at least two ways. But it is essential viewing for anyone alive today who hopes to understand the United States, its role in the world and its continued (seemingly endless) foreign policy mistakes, which have real world consequences for millions of people around the world, every day. Though it may not be Ken Burns’ best work in terms of consistency, it is, I believe, his most important documentary, and I only wish he had been able to make it 20 years earlier, when it was sorely, sorely needed to help prevent the next Vietnam-esque catastrophe of American foreign policy. This is incredibly long and incredibly depressing, but you really should watch it. Please watch it. Burns and Novicks’ film has at least three major issues that I want to get out of the way before I write a bit about why I think this is something you owe it to yourself to watch, despite its unrelenting depiction of human failure resulting in misery, cruelty and death. The three major nitpicks: Burns has long been attacked for his myopic focus on Americans and the American point of view in any of his films that have stretched beyond events in the US, particularly in The War. I am actually a pretty big fan of The War, despite its focus on Americans for a couple of reasons: Burns has made it clear he is concerned with American history. Most fictional American films about World War II present a very particular perspective, one that doesn’t really focus very much on the human suffering of the war. The conflict needed a more “ground truth” focused film than the previous TV documentaries about World War II. Burns’ film is hardly the last word in the story, and films can and should be made about other experiences, but I still think his film told a story that hadn’t received enough due, in a way that was refreshing compared to some of the myths about the so-called “greatest generation.” (That’s not to say Burns doesn’t reinforce other myths. He sure as hell does. See the current controversy over The Civil War and Robert E. Lee.) In The Vietnam War the focus is still very much on Americans but there is much more focus on the Vietnamese than you might expect from a self-professed American historian. There is a clear effort here to include the Vietnamese perspective. I think a film made by Vietnamese filmmakers would also be well worth watching but, as American films about the Vietnam War go, this has a fair enough of their perspective, and Burns, Novick et al. should be commended for that. This film is repetitive: some interviews are show multiple times, pictures are used multiple times, and there is sometimes a sense of deja vu when you start up a new episode. That is frustrating but it also serves an important purse, I believe, as there is a distinct repetition both to the foreign policy failures of the various administrations that got the US into Vietnam and continue the war, and to the avoidable foreign policy mistakes of subsequent administrations, so similar to those in Vietnam. Finally, there is the use of music. Prior to this film being released, there have been a lot of both fictional and nonfiction programs about the Vietnam War itself, and the era that it was fought in. These programs have used period music but particularly specific period popular music hits. This has been done so much that, at this point, the use of these hits with reference to this era, or the war in particular, is a . And here Burns and Novick often fail, using the most obvious songs they could think of, as everyone else has done since movies and shows have been made about the 1960s. Though there was once resonance for the boomers with this kind of music usage, I wonder if that resonance is gone now that such usage is such a cliche. But, for those of us who did not live through the era, and all we know of it is through pop culture, it is the most contrived and, frankly, annoying part of this film. “For What It’s Worth,” a number of Rolling Stones songs, CCR songs, Beatles songs, and any number of other songs have been used in the same context to death. There is a load of music from that that hasn’t been treated this way. It could have been used instead. But I regard all of these as relatively minor quibbles given the quality of the film overall. You can read all the books you want but there is no substitute for images when it comes to the horror of war. Though I have read at least one outstanding book about the Vietnam War, seeing the images – both the pictures and the footage – of the war conveys the sense of tragedy so much greater – and so much better – than any book you’ll ever read. Many of pictures are very hard to look at and the film footage is hard to watch but that is the point. We need to watch stuff like this so we are not disinterested. We need to be emotionally overcome because arguments aren’t going to do it. The saying goes that those who do not remember history are condemned to repeat it. But we do remember this war, just not well enough. It’s these images that are necessary to remember it. Reading a book will not do the human tragedy justice. Reading a book isn’t enough to prevent this from happening again. But it’s not just the images. The interviews in this film – from American and Vietnamese veterans, from Vietnamese civilians, from draft dodgers and protesters, from family members – are an essential part of our understanding of this. These were real people who died, were wounded, were psychologically damaged by this war. Watching these people speak – some of whom you might not agree with – about their experiences and their feelings, is like nothing else I think I’ve ever seen – save perhaps Shoah – in terms of putting the real, everyday human tragedy on screen, in your face, where it needs to be. Burns and Novick have done us all a huge service by cataloguing even just a few experiences of people involved in the Vietnam War. We could rationalize that the pictures and films are from another time, or we could tell ourselves they’re fictional. But we cannot deny the experiences of these people. They will break your heart, they will make you cry, they will haunt you. But this happened. And it happened because of good intentions. I can’t emphasize enough that, despite its flaws, these 17+ hours are worth your time. We need th e reminder that wars for peace have costs, real human costs. We need to remember this now as much as ever, as the United States government is once again talking in a language that suggests they will need to commit acts of violence to prevent violence. If only this film had been made 20 years ago, so we could have watched it when the United States decided they needed to invade Iraq to prevent more violence. Please watch it.
I know it's very very long, but it is absolutely worth every minute. They really go over the whole history of the thing, from colonial era to after South Vietnam fell, and bring out all the horrors of war in general, the political and military failures, and telling some people's stories from both sides in detail. Some of those stories really burn themselves into your mind (for example John Musgrave). They portray the horrors these frontline grunts went through in quite graphic detail, and it's the first time it really sunk in just how broken these guys were when they came home (if they came home).
One of the finest documentaries ever made Described by the show's official website as "an immersive 360-degree narrative," The Vietnam War is a behemoth in every sense of the word; written by historian Geoffrey C. Ward and directed by celebrated documentarians Ken Burns and Lynn Novick, the series cost $30 million to make, and was in production for over ten years, with the ten episodes running to a gargantuan eighteen hours. Assembled from over 24,000 photos and 1,500 hours of archive footage, the show features interviews with 79 people, including analysts, bureaucrats, journalists, artists, anti-war protestors, draft dodgers, conscientious objectors, deserters, Gold Star family members, and American, South Vietnamese, and North Vietnamese troops. Deliberately eschewing interviews with historians and major polarising figures, Burns and Novick concentrate almost exclusively on the experiences of ordinary people and soldiers from every side. The series also attempts to balance multiple perspectives; the American military and government, the South Vietnamese military and government, the North Vietnamese military and government, the anti-war movement, Gold Star families, journalists, and the intelligence community. And as a piece of documentary filmmaking, this is a masterpiece. For my complete review, please visit: https://boxd.it/xh8Kd














