They are NOT PORN STARS THAT IS VERY INSULTING TO CHILDREN (they are as young as 11 probably) and teenagers (no older than 16). Also one of the 2 youngest actors who looked about 10, or 11 was in the film with his older brother both their surnames are Good. So it would be unfair to accuse them of making a child abuse movie, absolutely not. Too free? Too naked? And too much nudity of young vulnerable kids....ok I agree. Why, are we not first seeing them all as children and giving children a chance to act in a movie that doesn't in any scene encourage sexual abuse. People ideas may vary but that's not the final point the point is they are like the title says children. Very selfish decisions to make it x rated. We have public gymns such as YMCA which probably have encouraged many more perverts