Chargement...
Chargement...



Pour quoi voulez-vous vivre ? Pour quoi êtes-vous prêts à mourir ?
Ils sont 6. Tous sont impliqués de près ou de loin dans le combat de l'Amérique contre le terrorisme. Chacun arrive à un tournant de sa vie, et les enjeux ne vont en être que plus élevés… À Washington, un sénateur aux ambitions présidentielles essaie de vendre la dernière stratégie globale à une journaliste d'information de télévision redoutée. Entre eux, c'est une lutte d'intelligence, de charme… et d'intérêts. Dans une université de la côte Ouest, un professeur idéaliste tente de convaincre un étudiant blasé de changer l'orientation de sa vie pour réaliser son potentiel. De l'autre côté de la planète, dans les montagnes enneigées de l'Afghanistan, deux de ses anciens élèves, loin des discours politiques et des arguments de leurs mentors, se battent juste pour survivre…
Avis de la communauté (2)
The story revolves around three parallel plotlines: the first follows an American senator (Tom Cruise) trying to pitch a new military plan to a journalist (Meryl Streep); the second involves a university professor (Robert Redford) attempting to convince a bright student to change his way of thinking and take on greater responsibility; and the third follows two young soldiers sent on a dangerous mission in Afghanistan—who, by the way, happen to be students of that professor. The connection between these three threads has an idea behind it, but the execution was a bit lukewarm. The film talks about politics, media, education, and war in a direct and clear manner, and this might be its biggest flaw. Instead of letting you immerse yourself in the story and reflect, it tries to serve you the moral lesson on a silver platter. I felt like the film was lecturing more than storytelling. That said, I can’t deny the acting… The entire cast delivered excellent performances. Tom Cruise was convincing as the smart and cunning politician, and Meryl Streep was brilliant as usual. Robert Redford was calm and profound in his role, though I felt his character was somewhat predictable. The direction is simple, and perhaps the most distinguishing feature of the film is its message, which asks: "As individuals, what is our responsibility toward the world around us?" An important question, but it could have been presented more powerfully. Honestly, the film wasn’t bad, but it wasn’t strong enough either. It works better as a discussion or study film rather than an entertaining one. My rating: 6/10 A political and intellectual film more than an entertaining one. Suitable for those who enjoy serious debates and deep dialogues, but not for all tastes.