Explore

Curator

Langue

Quantum Leap
6.9·2022–2024·2 Seasons·English
Canceled

One leap can change everything.

Sci-Fi & FantasyDramaMystery
Synopsis

It's been nearly 30 years since Dr. Sam Beckett stepped into the Quantum Leap accelerator and vanished. Now, a new team, led by physicist Ben Song, has been assembled to restart the project in hope of understanding the mysteries behind the machine and the man who created it. Everything changes, however, when Ben makes an unauthorized leap into the past, leaving the team behind to solve the mystery of why he did it.

Created by
Main Cast
Seasons · 2
More Like This
Communauté
6.6
Note Trakt
914 votes
10
117
9
53
8
123
7
233
6
149
5
106
4
33
3
33
2
19
1
45
20.5KSpectateurs
57.4KCollectés
8.2KListes

Avis de la communauté (11)

G
Geonn CannonCritique
Sep 27, 2022

This really is Quantum Leap in name only. I really wanted this to be good. For years, I said all reboots are unnecessary but QL actually made a kind of sense. You could cover a whole new era (and the time between the original series ending and now has certainly been... busy enough to fill a series). But this is just... not that. It's aggressively mediocre. They insist on splitting time between the leap and the project, where everyone is obsessed with a Big Conspiracy MacGuffin that really just eats up the run time. And because they keep shifting to that story, Ben's leaps are half-baked and rushed. Every emotional beat happens because "Well, we're almost at our quota of script pages, they should make up now." There's no emotional connection to anything Ben is doing in the past because the writers are more interested in filling in the blanks of the cliche conspiracy plot that has been done in every single scifi show of the past decade or so. [spoiler]I appreciate that they got Susan Diol back for the second episode[/spoiler] but at this point it just feels like they're hanging placards on things as a shortcut to making us care. They drop the name DR SAM BECKETT so they don't have to do any work to make you like drbensong. They think uttering the name CALAVICCI will connect you to janice. It's generic as hell, the dialogue is bad, the characters are cardboard, and it's not going to last long enough to lodge in your memory even if it hasn't been swiss-cheesed.

16
A
almantle
Mar 3, 2023

I really want to like this series but the more it goes on I can’t help but feel it’s trying to pander to every woke persuasion going. Ironically trying to target the very generation that’s never going to watch it. Tv & movies are supposed to be about entertainment & enjoyment not lessons on how you should think, which is why I’d be amazed if it carries on much longer. The original series’s I loved but this is just tarnishing it more every episode.

8
J
jaypatelani
Oct 14, 2022

don't compare it to original series. this one is good

7
D
daniel.e.jones@me.com
3/10Sep 21, 2022

Well I've watched the first episode. I'll comment later on this. As a child of the 80's, I love the original! There was chemistry between the Sam and Admiral. They linked the show together with the constant shifting cast and time period. My comment about this new show is this, it tries too hard to focus on Ben thoughts or feelings. It thinks less about saving someone/something in the time period he is stuck in. I ask, why do we need more characters based on Ben original time period? They don't add value to the story (They seem very emotional), in-fact this distracts from the problems and challenges of Ben ward/mission. I think the budget for this show was tight. So they spent less time trying to make a show about time travel (More props and locations) and more drama about people worried about someone stuck in time travel. If it was me, I would use this should show to focus on some of the best and worst periods of our history. Eg War in Afghanistan or Iraq, the signing of The Paris Agreement (Climate change), women's rights, LGBT rights... and so much more.

5
E
ErenJaeger35
8/10Nov 8, 2022

The 2022 series is as good as the original QL and I'm tired of pretending it's not.

4