Laden...
Laden...



Wenn Du nicht an das Böse glaubst, hast Du noch viel zu lernen!
Der 16jährige High-School-Absolvent Todd Bowden will seinen Augen nicht trauen: Mitten im Abendbus sitzt ihm der vor Jahrzehnten untergetauchte Nazi-Verbrecher Kurt Dussande gegenüber. Todd ist sich gewiss, dass er richtig liegt, denn seine Kenntnisse in deutscher Geschichte sind gut. Unerkannt wohnt der Massenmörder mit der Identität eines ukrainischen Einwohners in derselben Stadt wie Todd. Der Junge ersinnt einen Plan: Er beginnt, den alten Mann zu erpressen - will der nicht an die Behörden ausgeliefert werden, muss er Todd in allen Einzelheiten von seinen vielen Gräueltaten berichten. So ist es Todd möglich, geheime Macht- und Gewaltphantasien auszuleben. Dussander willigt ein, doch schon bald erkennt Todd, dass er in der bizarren Beziehung längst nicht mehr den Ton angibt. Er will aussteigen, bekommt vom Alt-Nazi aber erklärt, dass er nun bereits zu tief drinstecke. Damit hat Dussander alles andere als unrecht.
Avis de la communauté (5)
3 Thoughts After Watching ‘Apt Pupil’: 1. It’s difficult to enjoy a movie when the lead characters are extraordinarily unlikeable. 2. This is one of those films that inspire the oh-so-unfortunate post-screening thought: what was the point? Renfro’s character didn’t evolve into anything new. He was loony from the start. No journey there. I didn’t find their “outsmarting each other” relationship very compelling. I didn’t feel any stakes. I didn’t care about his grades. The girlfriend, the best friend... both basically filler. It just all felt a bit long and disconnected. 3. This probably works better as the novella it was intended to be, or even a single Twilight Zone episode.
Knowing who directed this and the suggestive material, makes it even more disturbing. Brad Renfro died way too young. It's painful to think, especially with young and talented performers, where their careers would be now if they were still here. It's sad to think about.
The movie was ok. I’m watching it after reading the book and of course they changed the material for the movie. It seems they always do. I feel the ending in the book was way more disturbing than than the movie. Starting from the hospital suicide all the way to the end of the movie was changed. There were bits and parts inside the movie that were different as well. But it was still enjoyable.
Level "Entertaining" • 6 ❤ • You may or may not enjoy this.
Ian McKellan is a Nazi war criminal hiding long-term in suburban America. Four decades after the war, a bright high school student with a fascination about WWII marks him on a bus ride and the two embark on a lengthy game of one-upsmanship. Oddly, the kid seems the more villainous of the two, though McKellan is himself far from heroic. I can't shake the sense that the concept was more daring than the film in this case. Featuring a Nazi in a decidedly grey light is a different take, for sure, but I felt like the filmmakers were always too afraid to go anywhere truly risqué with that material, and the core relationship between the two leads is toothless and pantomimed. Maybe that can be primarily chalked up to acting - Brad Renfro, who plays the kid, is positively grating in the role - but even removing that from the equation doesn't completely settle my stomach. It's a film that dances and loiters, but rarely has much to say of genuine power or meaning; wannabe edgy, using the taboo of an old war uniform to mask a serious lack of substance. Even the big reveal at the end, when everything comes apart at the seams, is hollow, telegraphed and half an hour behind schedule.