please watch the directors cut

When I rate movies, I basically do so for myself so that I know if it's worth revisiting. I also like to share my thoughts with my friends. Since I know myself and my friends well, I really just rate movies based on my enjoyment. A "favorite" is the term I use. I also think there are movies that I recommend people "watch" and there are movies that people should "see". To me "watching" and "seeing" a movie are separate things. "Dark City" is a movie that you see. It's amazing to look at. It's noir yet futuristic. I can't say it's really too similar to "Blade Runner", but I think if categorized as such, it gives you a good idea of what "Dark City" looks like. It's gloomy but it's not hard to see what's going on. The visuals are really a treat. The hard part to get past is even though I've seen it numerous times, I still struggle with the story. It's confusing and is definitely something you'll need to watch a few times. I think the fact that this film is difficult to decipher is why it hasn't received the recognition it probably deserves. I personally like it, but if I'm still trying to figure out the story after multiple viewings, I can't call it a great movie.

Alex Proyas, director of 1994's similarly moody action gloomer _The Crow_, brings us this bleak vision of stifling, gothic noir in a bottled city that's never seen the sun. Super stylish and visually ambitious, it's a film with a boatload of high-concept revelations and almost no sense of chill. Even the editing refuses to take breaks, with jump cuts and extreme close-ups roughly every second-and-a-half for the entire duration. That gives the whole picture a feel of frantic energy, which suits the amnesiac protagonist in his confused quest for answers, but can be exhausting for the viewer. Sometimes we just need a few beats to let the message sink in. Then again, when you've got as much thematic ammunition as Proyas does in _Dark City_, maybe such intellectual force-feedings are preferable to a four-hour running time. It's a motion picture that often transcends the value of its components, succeeding in spite of its missteps and shortcomings. Many key elements take the form of guilty pleasures, far better in practice than they have any right to be, from the _Nosferatu_-esque pale, thin men in long black coats to the wacky, _Akira_-influenced psychokinetic duels near the end. That carries over to the not-quite-polished special effects, too, which occasionally show their seams and stitches but, somehow, feel more honest and appreciable for it. There's a lot to soak in here, maybe too much for one movie, but I admire the effort and thoroughly enjoyed the end product. Would-be viewers should be ready to think and pay attention, lest they find themselves washed away by the raging torrent of ideas.