I don't understand grown adults that call themselves "orphans" when the term is specific to children. It's even more inappropriate when the adult is decades, let alone half a century, out of their childhood when they lost their parents.

The inability of men to relate to women.

Tortured east coast elites wallowing in their own self created sorrow and whining about their damaged relationships for 90 minutes.

PREVIEW & CONSIDERATIONS FROM HUDSON “Ex-Husbands” (2025) has garnered a spectrum of critical responses, highlighting both its strengths and areas where it may not resonate with all audiences. Critical Reception: • Roger Ebert: The film is praised for its “tender spirit” and “poetic, dialogue-driven calmness,” offering a “refreshingly kind, gentle, and soft side of masculinity.”  • Slant Magazine: Commends the film’s exploration of “the push and pull of marriage” and the “challenges of moving on from a break-up,” though it notes the pacing is “breezy,” which may affect engagement.  • Collider: Observes that while there are “darkly comedic” moments, the film doesn’t fully embrace “true black humor,” potentially leading to a tonal imbalance.  • Rotten Tomatoes: Mentions that the comedy is “mostly squelched by the tangible depression felt by the collective menfolk,” suggesting a heavier emotional undertone than expected.  • Next Best Picture: Highlights the film’s “nuanced and mature look at adult relationships,” but points out that the premise “takes a bit to get going,” with some reliance on “broad tropes.”  Considerations: The pacing and tonal shifts have been noted as potential drawbacks. If you’re in the mood for a character-driven narrative that explores the complexities of family dynamics, this film could be worth your time. Otherwise, it might be prudent to consider other options that align more closely with your current cinematic preferences. -- Crafted with Hudson—your AI concierge, cinematic confidant, and purveyor of critical insights.