Explore

Curator

Langue

A Hole in the World

8.4·7.7Trakt·March 28, 2023·43min
Synopsis

The team investigates a pattern of kidnappings which leads them to a discovery that hits close to home with one of their own. Meanwhile, Lucy and Tim’s relationship is put to the test as they begin to feel the hard hours of their jobs.

Guest Stars · 10
Lisseth Chavez

Lisseth Chavez

Celina Juarez

Brent Huff

Brent Huff

Officer Quigley Smitty

Marlene Forte

Marlene Forte

Carla Juarez

Don McManus

Don McManus

Officer Joel Chambers

Henri Lubatti

Henri Lubatti

Drew Heslov

Colleen Foy

Colleen Foy

Amanda Vargas

Miguel Pérez

Miguel Pérez

Detective Dave Delgado

Diana Atai

Metro Cop

Vivian Stein

Olivia

Paula Alvarez

Officer

Communauté
7.7
Note Trakt
1.0K votes
10
156
9
88
8
263
7
305
6
169
5
10
4
7
3
1
2
2
1
3
51.5KSpectateurs
53.6KCollectés
52Listes

Avis de la communauté (4)

J
jorvikmike
Mar 29, 2023

A much better episode than the last episode debacle. Just wish the narrative would change in a lot of these shows, the evil white cop thing, is wearing very thin.

10
W
wolfkinCritique
Mar 29, 2023

Oh man the copaganda is strong with this one. It hit me so hard in this episode I had a bit of whiplash. I like Selena as a character but why is she allowed to be so close to this case? I think her entire character is written to be "gets too close to the case and flips out inappropriately so everyone can dress her down". It's silly. I don't blame this on the actress. Heck I don't even blame it on Selena. I blame it on everyone else who keeps letting her participate. It's ridiculous from the times she goes "I can handle whatever it is… tell me" and then right after finding out goes "NO… no… you're wrong". And then everyone dresses her down like "Hey Officer Juarez, be objective". Ironically, they are the ones not being objective. They're wildly speculating. In real life, cops who do this *are the problem*. But because it's TV, their wild speculation is 100% on the mark with no errors. Selena's problem isn't "Not being objective". It's being emotional. Openly emotional. You could have an argument about the sexism in that scene but generally I don't think The Rookie has as big a problem in that area. I like how this is the second cop show this week, where I've seen cops threaten someone with rape. I don't know what else "or do you remember what it's like to be a pedophile behind bars" is supposed to mean. Oh, maybe it just means assault. That's… better? This show and other cop shows want you to think if you just talk to cops and you're empathetic enough cops will believe the words coming out of your mouth. _Never_ talk to the police more than required. _Never_ volunteer information. _Always_ get a lawyer. Cops will use what happens on TV to trick you in real life. On TV, the cops will just ask you to talk to them and just tell them real quick and they'll let you go and find the real bad guy. In real life if you say anything that can be used out of context to make YOU look like the bad guy, then they'll just do that. It's easier and they don't have to hunt down someone they might or might not find. After all cops love to talk about how many crimes they solve. Doesn't matter if they solve it correctly. That number doesn't get publicized. Cops will convince you that you don't need a lawyer and if you talk now it won't be as bad for you. It _will_ be as bad for you. They're under zero obligation to treat you better because you were cooperative. Unless it's in writing you're free game. Half the time even if it's in writing no one will see it anyway to contradict if they decide against it anyway. That's just something cops say they do on TV. Like asking suspects to just confess… because they're staring at them with their sexy steely eyed gaze? The LAPD cops find a convicted pedophile they're legally allowed to harass any time they want for zero reason (and yes that's harassment but because it's a pedophile we're supposed to think "well good. He deserved it. They need this power to harass scum like that". Nevermind that IRL this get used against a single mother with two kids working three jobs who doesn't even have time to get sexually assaulted by a LEO today but hey whatever). They find this guy. He's super cagey. He has mementos of the missing child. Then, when they bring him in, he acts shocked at the momentos and they stop thinking he might be responsible. Now they stop looking at him for the crime because it has to be the stand-up cop who has no evidence against him. Nah couldn't be the pedo where the only evidence was found. And of course again, because it's TV, they are 100% right. There is a super tight conspiracy where a cop does everything right and frames someone perfectly while committing horrific crimes repeatedly every year like a criminal mastermind. But sure somehow it's way more plausible that PerfectCop is the perpetrator and not the guy who did it repeatedly and shows zero remorse. The hidden message of this portion is that cop guts are how police work should be done. The cop suspected another cop based on gut instinct. The cop let go of the creepy man based on gut instinct. Honestly the irony of "We can't arrest him. That starts a 72 hour clock after which we have to let him go if we don't have a charge" and then they solve the mystery and find the girl in like 5 hours just baffles me. Cops do this stuff all the time arrest people for 24 hours and ruin them just because they want to do it. But because it's a fellow cop he "knows all the procedures". Cops don't have special procedures. Cops don't even have good procedures. What they have is money and numbers. LAPD Patrol isn't some silent hero-team doing elite level effort on grunt work on the streets that no one appreciates. They do what they want, when they want and they have the legal authority and weaponry to get away with anything. If some LAPD cop wants to get tatted up like a gangster and ride around the highway with longguns for no reason in an unmarked car and pull over a teenager and her father who assume people in unmarked cards with tatts and guns are just gangsters (to be fair that was a Sacramento not LAPD incident). They will. They don't have to justify it. They just do it and then when all is said and done they'll arrest everyone questioning them for obstruction and resisting arrest. The stuff that happens on The Rookie is pure fantasy. And as Wheel of Time heads will know based on my username I love fantasy. No one looks at Death Valley (2011) and says those cops are real. People look at the Rookie and everything is presented as if it's real or real adjacent. On top of all the random legal corruption and illegal corruption, there are semi-organized gangs within law enforcement and no one has the authority or will to do anything about it. They rape, they murder, they kill pets, they steal and all of it makes them so hard they'll go home and give it to the wife or 40% of the time take it out on the wife. The Rookie, however, wants me to buy that one of the most infamous beats in the nation dresses down their rookies for being "not being objective". And that final showdown? I don't know what I supposed to take from this except that [spoiler]cops want to kill you. Because there's no reason to breach an empty abandoned house RIGHT AFTER the only hostage was freed. They keep talking about wondering if they could have talked him down and whether it was necessary and honestly. It wasn't. There was no rush. No urgency. No safety concern and yet they ran in as soon as possible. Who was he a danger to? Himself? Well lucky he didn't kill himself then. Oh he was suicidal guess we should bum rush him. And this is how they treat one of their own[/spoiler]. And Officer Juarez forgiving her mother saying it wasn't her fault it was her sickness when two episodes ago she was saying functionally how dare her mother blame this on her sickness and it was her fault. Pick a lane sugar (I'm trying to pick a pejorative to her age not her gender), either you understand addiction is a disease or you don't. You don't get to pick and choose when you care. More specifically you don't get to pick and choose and then dress down everyone else for not understanding when your understanding is conditional. You just know before this arc started she would have dressed down anyone just like every other TV cop who refused addiction as a disease. How the mighty have fallen. Seeing Wesley talk about how he can "sell" a scenario where one person did the crime and not the other one in spite of zero evidence is gross. It's exactly the kind of prosecutorial overreach that Wesley used to talk about when his character was introduced. It's entirely the sort of thing that leads to people getting convicted for crimes they didn't do. There are far too many people in /r/TheRookie, who seem to love Schmitty. He's an awful character but he is everyone's favorite incompetent and finally he does something effectively and efficiently. In another show these wouldn't be a big deal. Cop shows are cop shows and they're lies from the opening credits to closing credits. Everything about them is a lie from how much they hate IA, to how cops will lie to other cops about whether they're being investigated, to how cops will sit across from you in an interrogation room, to how cops won't lie and make up evidence to get you to convict yourself. We all know these are laws and every cop show since the dawn of the cop show in the 60s or 70s has been feeding us this lie to the point where too many people don't understand it as a lie until they're faced with the reality.

6
A
aminebadri04
Sep 10, 2023

i just wanted to add something about last episode .. how is an under cover cop put his face on the media like make a documentary and interviews.. not just that but even the story of double means that image will stick in your head. so how does it work , all the gang and crime people don't have tv or not watching that stuff ?! and this cops went in like 3 documentaries... one cop was accused of murder and his famous.

3
N
nicky2910
6/10Mar 29, 2023